CYRUS.OLINGERStart a project
Menu

Licensing

Five questions
set the price.

The short version

You are buying permission,
not the photograph.

A photographer holds copyright and grants a licence for agreed use. That structure exists so the same frame can serve an editorial feature, a brand campaign and a gallery print without any of them getting in each other’s way. It also means the terms have to be specific: an unlimited licence and a one-year regional one are genuinely different products.

Scope builder

Say exactly
what you need.

Work through the five axes below. The summary on the right builds itself, and you can copy it into your first message. Nothing is stored and nothing is sent until you send it.

UsageWhere will the image actually appear?

Usage is the specific placement, not a vague category. "Social" and "a billboard in Times Square" are both advertising, and they are not the same license.

TermFor how long?

A license with no end date is a license forever, which is a different product with a different price. Most commercial licenses run one to three years.

TerritoryWhere in the world?

Geography still matters even when everything is online, because media buying and market value are still regional.

ExclusivityCan anyone else license it?

Exclusivity is what a brand pays for when it needs to be the only one using an image. It also removes the photographer's ability to earn from that frame elsewhere.

Credit and disclosureHow is authorship shown?

Credit is normal in editorial and negotiable in advertising. Endorsement disclosure is separate and is not negotiable: the FTC expects it where the endorsement appears.

VolumeHow many images?

Licensing three frames from one shoot is a different conversation from licensing an entire set. Say the number even if it is a guess.

Straight answers

Things people
reasonably get wrong.

None of these are traps. They come up in almost every first conversation, and clearing them early makes the rest of the negotiation short and friendly.

01

We paid for the shoot, so we own the photos.

Paying for a shoot buys the production and a licence to use the results. Copyright stays with the photographer unless a contract explicitly transfers it. This is the default under United States copyright law and it is the norm across the industry.

02

It is only going on social, so it is not commercial.

A brand posting on its own channels is commercial use. It is usually inexpensive commercial use, and it is a perfectly reasonable licence to buy, but calling it editorial does not make it editorial.

03

Credit is payment.

Credit is good practice and it is welcome. It does not replace a fee, and offering it as compensation reads exactly the way you would expect it to read.

04

We just need a buyout to keep it simple.

A buyout is the permanent transfer of an asset, which is the most expensive thing a client can ask for. In most cases a three-year worldwide licence covers everything the campaign will actually do, for a fraction of the cost.

05

The image is already public, so we can use it.

Being visible online is not a licence. Neither is a Creative Commons search result that turns out to be mislabelled. Ask; archive licensing is usually fast and reasonable.

Two routes

Commission it,
or licence what exists.

Both are legitimate. The right one depends on whether you need a specific idea or a specific image.

Route one

Archive licensing

Licence an existing landscape, night-sky, aerial or travel frame. Faster, cheaper, and no weather risk. Best when you need a particular place or mood and the exact composition is negotiable.

  • Curated search against your brief
  • Defined usage, term and territory
  • Delivery in days rather than weeks
  • No production or travel costs
Describe what you are looking for ↗
Route two

Commissioned production

New work built around your objective, with the licence agreed before anyone travels. Best when the idea, the product, the location or the message has to be specific.

  • Concept and shot planning
  • Field production and post
  • Licence scoped alongside the deliverables
  • Weather contingency written into the plan
See how projects are scoped ↗

Further reading

Not just one photographer’s opinion.

The structure described here follows standard industry practice. If you want to check any of it independently, these are the primary references.

Not legal adviceThis page explains how licensing normally works so a first conversation can be productive. It is not legal advice, and a contract governs whatever you actually agree.

Know your scope?

Send it over
with the image in mind.

Start a licence request